America's struggle with universal linguistics
There have been speculations that German was close to becoming America's official language in 1776- and even though this isn't entirely true, the voters were still debating on creating copies of federal laws in the German language.
That proposition was turned down; but we have come a long way from the 18th century. This is just one example that reflects America's struggle with linguistic differences and the debate of what should be the nation's official language.
With official languages, if America was to ever implement a law that required ALL states to be English oriented exclusively, that would mean that personal documents, voting polls, tax forms, etc. would all be in the English language. There would be no translations for those struggling with the language and truly, it would be a harmful tactic in the basis of democracy if people were unable to pay their taxes properly or express their opinions with ease.
Connecting back to voting polls, it is true that federal spending is extremely costly. Translators in Los Angeles, California were payed $265 a day, and in total, $15 million was spent on maintaining the establishment of translators for voting polls.
But, what is wrong with providing assistance to those in need in order to preserve democracy? In order to preserve America's strong moral of inclusiveness?
With the establishment of an English-only society, this would affect those who rely on American Sign Language, because it would "prevent government communication with the hard of hearing" ("Does").
Although, it is important to keep in mind that American sign language is not the only sign language that is frequently used in America. Pidgin Signed English (PSE) is very common among deaf individuals, especially those who "learn to sign later in life." Sign language is never universal, and it's important to see how keeping translations open to variations of languages is necessary. American Sign Language (ASL) is known as a visual language and does not translate directly to English.
Here is a picture that shows the ASL translation for "vote." Imagine if these individuals were unable to get the resources they needed to properly participate in democratic responsibilities. America is known for its democracy, so let's make sure that these true American ideals continue to live on, even when it comes to those who speak ASL, PSE, etc.
Credit: Handspeak
People tend to forget about disabled people who are just as important in American society as anyone else. Would taking away translations and assistance in order to establish English as a official language really be worth it if these circumstances come in mind? Would America still cater to those disabled and prioritize their needs after this proposition is established?
Refugees coming into America are focused on finally assimilating into a safe environment, and sometimes they might still be dealing with trauma they have faced in their home country. Giving them time to learn the English language is the least we can do in order to show support as decent human beings.
Overall, Americans are aware that English is a powerful and beautiful language, but it's not the only language.
What's interesting is that you have the same data as Jimmy's post, but you both take the argument in different directions; he makes the point that the costs for translators and the like mean America should be an official English-only state; you say that the cost incurred with these translators in California (as one example) suggest a sacrifice to "preserve democracy" I think it's a compelling argument.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I wonder about the economic argument about saving jobs. Here's another one--does one keep buying a typewriter to keep typewriting manufacturers in business? The evolution of jobs can be compared to the evolution of languages. They all evolve with use and need.
Hi Alex,
ReplyDeleteI found your argument to be very compelling, to where you've made me evaluate my thinking that if the United States was in fact "English-only", it would be detrimental to society around us. I initially had not thought that it could have other effects besides decreasing the diversity and/or culture of the people around us. 'Preserving democracy and inclusiveness'... this point couldn't have been said any better. Language needs to exist to fulfill these responsibilities of the U.S., they are a part of the freedom of expression in our country and this topic should not be taken lightly. Thank you for enlightening me!
Allison Miles