Wage Discrimination Alongside Gender Inequality in the Workplace
Wage Discrimination Alongside Gender
Inequality in the Workplace
In various countries,
women on average receive hourly wages that, when compared to their male associates, are quite
obviously preferential. The wage gaps between genders vary, to the point where
in 2015, women "were over sixty percent of
workers paid at or below the federal minimum wage, and they were the majority
of full-time workers who earned less than $400 per week."
However, after the late
1970s, there has been a substantial increase in women's relative earnings. On the other hand though,
'substantial increase', while well-intentioned, does not mean an equal amount
of increased salary. "During the last 35 years, as women have increased
their time in the labor market and attained higher levels of education and
professional qualifications, women’s earnings have increased substantially and
the gender wage gap has narrowed. Although the gap between women’s and men’s
median earnings has decreased, women continue to earn substantially less than men."

There are some factors
to keep in mind while analyzing this topic, like how race, ethnicity, religion,
age, and education level come into play. For example, in addition to the wage
inequality, wage discrimination (when individuals with
similar education or working experience perform alike jobs, yet are paid
differently) is also a component for black and Hispanic women. Those individuals, who
possess bachelor's degrees, receive lower weekly pay than men, and even Asian
and white women who have the same credentials and educational level.
With age, on average,
women are paid 90 percent of what men are paid up until the
age of 35. From 35 years-old to retirement, women typically earn 75 to 80
percent of what men earn. It’s no coincidence that this is the age
many women start families, and studies show that working women's upward mobility may take a hit when
interrupted by maternity leave. "Earnings
for both female and male full-time workers tend to increase with age, though
earnings increase more slowly after age 45 and even decrease after age 55.
The gender pay gap also grows with age, and
differences among older workers are considerably larger than gaps among younger
workers. In 2016 women ages 20–24 were paid 96 percent of what men were paid,
decreasing to 78–89 percent from age 25 to age 54. By the time workers reach
55–64 years old, women are paid only 74 percent of what men are paid."
In a 2012 analysis, the American Association of
University Women (AAUW) found that even after controlling for occupation,
industry, hours, work experience, college major, religion, race/ethnicity, GPA,
education, number of children and marital status, women are paid only 82
percent of what their male peers are earning just a year after college
graduation. Ten years out of college, the gap widens with women earning a
mere 69 percent of what men earn.
These studies may have
slightly different observations and results, but they are all very similar with
the fact that women's salaries fluctuate because of factors they cannot
control: their gender, race, and age.
It's important to
analyze this data, and also evaluate the root of the problem, such as: how
companies and businesses can improve hiring and compensation processes. For
example, what questions are being asked in interviews? How are promotions and
bonuses being measured? What practices are in place-- or are missing/require
rethinking --that could be contributing to the pay gap?
Most importantly,
equality cannot be considered as an afterthought. It must be part of the
company's core beliefs and the tone of this should be set from the top of the
company.
Women cannot and
should not have to wait until 2059 for equal pay to become a reality. It's up
to every business leader and advocate to take action, to ensure that every
employee is fairly compensated.
I'm with you on this. The studies are there, they're vast, and they have proven that across disciplines, with equal experience and education, women (and women of color in particular) get the worst end of pay disparity. Perhaps what women need to do is get into positions of authority (break that glass ceiling) to affect change. I mean, just like at Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's statement about his gender-balanced cabinet. When a reporter asked him about why he did that, his response was, "Because it's 2015" (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/04/canada-cabinet-gender-diversity-justin-trudeau). So while women need to make their way up the ladder, of course there needs to be men like Trudeau who understand that more balance in representation will generate more equality when women are at the table. This is a huge fight women (and men) have to continue to address...
ReplyDeleteWhat an informative post. It really is a shame that issues like this still exist in our society. What is even more disappointing is how everyone is well aware that there are an astounding amount of overqualified women receiving a percentage of men's wages. I also found it interesting that although the gap between wages has decreased, women still get the short end of the stick. No matter how hard I think about it and how little sense it makes to me, women get underpaid simply because they are women. Reading posts like these makes me think about how many positions are currently being occupied by under qualified men, when they're are women that are in the same position but get paid significantly less. The fact that an issue like this even exists is absurd to say the least, and women should not have to wait to get paid what they deserve. How can we call ourselves intelligent beings if we can't solve such a primitive issue?
ReplyDelete